<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Dating DNA Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.datingdna.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.datingdna.com</link>
	<description>Social Networking's Free Dating Service</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:40:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Find &amp; Filter&#8221; &#8212; The Heart of Online Dating by Amanda Cline</title>
		<link>http://blog.datingdna.com/2008/07/10/find-and-filter/#comment-1442</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amanda Cline]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datingdna.wordpress.com/?p=12#comment-1442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love DNA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love DNA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Community Monitoring:  The Dating DNA Community Decides Who to Reject by datingdna</title>
		<link>http://blog.datingdna.com/2009/04/10/the-dating-dna-community-decides-who-to-reject/#comment-1402</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[datingdna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.datingdna.com/?p=212#comment-1402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kitty: You had created FOUR profiles, all with different names and information, one was even a man.  We only allow one profile per user.  Because we require users be honest about the information on their profile, having four different ones means at least one is not accurate, if not all four.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kitty: You had created FOUR profiles, all with different names and information, one was even a man.  We only allow one profile per user.  Because we require users be honest about the information on their profile, having four different ones means at least one is not accurate, if not all four.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Community Monitoring:  The Dating DNA Community Decides Who to Reject by Kitty</title>
		<link>http://blog.datingdna.com/2009/04/10/the-dating-dna-community-decides-who-to-reject/#comment-1401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kitty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.datingdna.com/?p=212#comment-1401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This website is stupid, I only joined two days ago and when I signed in today it said I was banned which is silly because I havnt violated any of the terms.
Also I was talking to someone who I was getting on with really well, so that will never amount to anything now thanks to these stupid imbeciles that run this application.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This website is stupid, I only joined two days ago and when I signed in today it said I was banned which is silly because I havnt violated any of the terms.<br />
Also I was talking to someone who I was getting on with really well, so that will never amount to anything now thanks to these stupid imbeciles that run this application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Community Monitoring:  The Dating DNA Community Decides Who to Reject by datingdna</title>
		<link>http://blog.datingdna.com/2009/04/10/the-dating-dna-community-decides-who-to-reject/#comment-1380</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[datingdna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 23:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.datingdna.com/?p=212#comment-1380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chrissy:  You had uploaded photos of someone that wasn&#039;t you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrissy:  You had uploaded photos of someone that wasn&#8217;t you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Community Monitoring:  The Dating DNA Community Decides Who to Reject by Chrissy</title>
		<link>http://blog.datingdna.com/2009/04/10/the-dating-dna-community-decides-who-to-reject/#comment-1379</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chrissy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 22:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.datingdna.com/?p=212#comment-1379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I looked at the reasons but I was none of these is there a way you could Let me back on???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked at the reasons but I was none of these is there a way you could Let me back on???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Community Monitoring:  The Dating DNA Community Decides Who to Reject by datingdna</title>
		<link>http://blog.datingdna.com/2009/04/10/the-dating-dna-community-decides-who-to-reject/#comment-1377</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[datingdna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.datingdna.com/?p=212#comment-1377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Melissa:  As per the email you received, you uploaded a photo of someone that wasn&#039;t you to your profile.  It was a photo of Sofia Vergara.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Melissa:  As per the email you received, you uploaded a photo of someone that wasn&#8217;t you to your profile.  It was a photo of Sofia Vergara.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Community Monitoring:  The Dating DNA Community Decides Who to Reject by Melissa</title>
		<link>http://blog.datingdna.com/2009/04/10/the-dating-dna-community-decides-who-to-reject/#comment-1376</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Melissa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.datingdna.com/?p=212#comment-1376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was deleted for what???? Because I wouldn&#039;t respond to every message I received? This is bs. I want to know the reason &amp; would appreciate it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was deleted for what???? Because I wouldn&#8217;t respond to every message I received? This is bs. I want to know the reason &amp; would appreciate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zero Tolerance for Perverts, Fibbers, Fakes, Spammers, and Scammers by datingdna</title>
		<link>http://blog.datingdna.com/2008/06/28/frauds/#comment-1366</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[datingdna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 00:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datingdna.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-1366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Benji,

Not sure it was some &quot;weirdo&quot; personality thing.  We reviewed your chat log and it most definitely did NOT belong on a G-rated site.  It was pretty hard core, and certainly not G-rated.

We get reports every day from women flagging someone, and when we go to send them a &quot;thank you for flagging this user&quot; message, we see they have removed their profile and left the service, probably because they were offended.  This is why we take all this very serious.  It scares users away, particularly women.  As with most dating sites, for every woman there are two or three men, so the last thing we want to do is scare them away.

Dating DNA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benji,</p>
<p>Not sure it was some &#8220;weirdo&#8221; personality thing.  We reviewed your chat log and it most definitely did NOT belong on a G-rated site.  It was pretty hard core, and certainly not G-rated.</p>
<p>We get reports every day from women flagging someone, and when we go to send them a &#8220;thank you for flagging this user&#8221; message, we see they have removed their profile and left the service, probably because they were offended.  This is why we take all this very serious.  It scares users away, particularly women.  As with most dating sites, for every woman there are two or three men, so the last thing we want to do is scare them away.</p>
<p>Dating DNA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zero Tolerance for Perverts, Fibbers, Fakes, Spammers, and Scammers by Benji</title>
		<link>http://blog.datingdna.com/2008/06/28/frauds/#comment-1365</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 22:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datingdna.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-1365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, my name is Benji and I&#039;m probably exactly the type of guy you had in mind when you describe the over familiar weirdo, however I think I&#039;m just misunderstood. You see, the problem with the Internet is that it doesn&#039;t utilize Mans best communication techniques - body language, and tone of voice, which compromise 85% of our message, while our words only make up a mere 15%. I&#039;ve made plenty of friends on DNA over the past year, however it took a long time for people to warm up to me, seeing as how I&#039;m kind of a wise guy, and they have no way of knowing. Unfortunately, some people took me the wrong way when they were describing themselves as victims of cheating, and I went on to share my story as &quot;a victim of cheating&quot; and how I was sadly &quot;caught in the act by my third wife&quot; and how &quot;painful it was to have to make up more lies to cover up all my other lies.&quot; I then asked for some helpful advice. They didn&#039;t take to kindly to my joke, and now I am banned. Most people found that funny, however some didn&#039;t pick up on my failed attempt to make them laugh. Now I am writing to you in hopes that you can find it in your heart to re-activate my account. Thank you for your time.

-Beni]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, my name is Benji and I&#8217;m probably exactly the type of guy you had in mind when you describe the over familiar weirdo, however I think I&#8217;m just misunderstood. You see, the problem with the Internet is that it doesn&#8217;t utilize Mans best communication techniques &#8211; body language, and tone of voice, which compromise 85% of our message, while our words only make up a mere 15%. I&#8217;ve made plenty of friends on DNA over the past year, however it took a long time for people to warm up to me, seeing as how I&#8217;m kind of a wise guy, and they have no way of knowing. Unfortunately, some people took me the wrong way when they were describing themselves as victims of cheating, and I went on to share my story as &#8220;a victim of cheating&#8221; and how I was sadly &#8220;caught in the act by my third wife&#8221; and how &#8220;painful it was to have to make up more lies to cover up all my other lies.&#8221; I then asked for some helpful advice. They didn&#8217;t take to kindly to my joke, and now I am banned. Most people found that funny, however some didn&#8217;t pick up on my failed attempt to make them laugh. Now I am writing to you in hopes that you can find it in your heart to re-activate my account. Thank you for your time.</p>
<p>-Beni</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Community Monitoring:  The Dating DNA Community Decides Who to Reject by datingdna</title>
		<link>http://blog.datingdna.com/2009/04/10/the-dating-dna-community-decides-who-to-reject/#comment-1343</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[datingdna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 03:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.datingdna.com/?p=212#comment-1343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ax:  As was explained in the now two emails that have been sent to you, you were removed for obscene language in the chat rooms.  The site is G rated.  

Dating DNA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ax:  As was explained in the now two emails that have been sent to you, you were removed for obscene language in the chat rooms.  The site is G rated.  </p>
<p>Dating DNA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

